Zero Trust Security White Paper is the next phase of network security, it is the future of the secure network. Hence, is the new way to secure information. It takes a different approach to network security. It says that trust should be based on identity and not access. The traditional way to provide access is through identification. The Zero Trust White Paper says that identity has to be verified before access and provisioned through role-based access controls.
White Paper also says that the user’s identity is not enough, the user’s device and the user environment should also be verified for trust. Examples include a strong authentication process and a device with integrity protection. This means that each end device has to check its integrity before connecting to the company’s network. This is what we call zero trust security white paper.
Replacing the traditional way
The Zero Trust Security describes how traditional network security is being replaced by this new way of thinking. It’s about how to secure your enterprise’s information assets. Network security used to be all about providing users with access to systems and data. Nowadays, it’s all about verifying the identities of users, devices, and applications before they can connect to your enterprise’s assets.
This new model of identity-based security is in stark contrast to the access-based model. Wherein IT professionals used for years, where access rights are granted based on users’ identities as opposed to their actions. Zero Trust Security White Paper calls this access-based model “permission-based security” or “permissioned security.” Because it allows users to access data based on their permissions or permissions granted by other systems or people in their roles within an organization.
The allowed model of IT security works well in an environment where users know entities from a trusted location. And are attempting to gain access from a known location as well; however, in today’s world of business, where businesses rely heavily on cloud services and mobile devices, this model just doesn’t cut it anymore (Zero Trust Security White Paper).
Challenges of Zero Trust Security White Paper
The problems with the term zero trust security are twofold. First, the phrase “zero trust” is with too many meanings. Zero Trust Security White Paper implies a number of different things depending on how we use them.
1=Access control based on identity and behavior versus access control based on permissions
2=Access control based on whitelisting versus access control based on blacklisting
3= No trust in endpoints or devices versus no trust in users themselves
4=No need for MFA versus need for MFA with stronger credentials (including biometrics)
Second, many organizations have already implemented elements of zero-trust security without realizing it. Further, the term zero trust security makes it seem like an entirely new concept when in reality, it’s a philosophy that combines several existing best practices into one coherent whole.
The problem with the label zero trust is that it makes it seem like an entirely new approach. In reality, organizations are already implementing elements of zero-trust security into their environment. But just haven’t connected all the dots yet. Zero Trust Security is all about connecting those dots and providing a more formal definition than what currently exists out there in cyberspace.